Okokok, all criticism is good criticism; even if it is only good enough to balance the advice of helpful readers.
I had posted a funny story titled "Gladiator" and something struck me as wrong. Someone pointed out that if they picked that story because of that title, either they would end up mad because there was not enough gladiating in the story, OR, they'd not have picked a story with that title in the first place.
Huh. Readers think about a story's title? Who'd a thunk it?
Short read on a long post: it's still the same funny story but the title is changed to "That Johnny and the Gladiator".